Ursula von der Leyen is thinking about the mandatory nature of vaccines for EU citizens. All doubts and lack of transparency of the system
The President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen is thinking about the possibility of compulsory vaccines for all inhabitants of the European Union. However “The appeal not to get vaccinated is a call to die”, Prime Minister Mario Draghi said. Vaccine or death, here is the theme.
Raising doubts on this topic and the one relative to the salvation that political decision-makers bring, is equivalent to deserting, to questioning the safety of the community and of individuals. In the Covid society, doubts and conflicts of interest, even if only potential, between medical scientists, politicians and pharmaceutical companies have disappeared.
It has become normal for the European Commission to hold on contracts hidden of anti-Covid vaccines. The contracts are largely obscured and permission to disclose the information contained is denied.
It is normal that part of the the scientific community does not have access to the raw data of the trials which led to the creation of the vaccines and does not have access to post-adverse reaction autopsies, when they are performed. It is normal to minimize it Pfizergate scandal, published by the British Medical Journal, which reveals falsifications in medical trials. It is forbidden to claim that the most powerful investment funds and banks, which think about making money and not saving people, are inside the main pharmaceutical companies involved in mass Covid vaccination. And the Italians can’t even dare to argue that on drugs, the only information our doctors receive is from pharmaceutical companiesAnd. Nor can we refer to the influence exercised by the pharmaceutical industry, with the promotion of its products, on the behavior of individual doctors, institutions and politicians. There is no conflict of interest between politics, doctors and pharmaceutical industries: it cannot exist. There is only the vaccine or death dichotomy, when too the ISS claims that those affected by Sars-Cov-2 face a very low possible mortality of 2%. That of MERS-CoV was 34%, that of SARS-CoV-1 was 9.6%, Ebola of 50% and smallpox of 30%.
Anti Covid vaccines: Ema, Aifa, regulatory agencies and political conditioning
During Covid, it became taboo to question the independence and sanctity of those involved. It will definitely be normal. Like the fact that the pharmaceutical industries, through their payments, support 86% of the budget of the EMA Agency, the European Union agency that evaluates drugs. Wasn’t it better that the EMA, for greater independence, was financed entirely from the EU budget and that the EU in turn collected taxes from the pharmaceutical industry? Politicians think not. The EMA Executive Director is appointed by the EMA Board of Directors, on a proposal from the European Commission. As well as in Aifa, the Italian drug agency, the appointments of the top management they are made by the Minister of Economy and Finance, the Minister of Health and the State-Regions Conference. Therefore, politics weighs on the supervisory bodies, in this intertwining between medical scientists and political decision makers. We have no doubts that the heads of the regulatory agencies are all independent, above the parties, unwilling to be influenced by politics, career and money. But we ask ourselves: is it still permissible ask yourself the question of how long these leaders would remain in their place if they expressed opinions diametrically opposed to those of the political decision-makers who appointed them !? But that’s not possible in the age of vaccine or death.
The investigation into an exchange of messages between Ursula von der Leyen and the CEO of Pfizer
One of the main players in this whole game is the European Commission and its president, the German Ursula von der Leyen.
A few months ago von der Leyen was at the center of a request from the office of the Union Ombudsman, Emily O’Reilly, to clarify the exchange of messages between her and the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla. Let’s talk about the text messages sent and received by the two during the negotiations on providing the EU with 1.8 billion doses of the anti-Covid vaccine. The question was raised by the New York Times who asked several questions, never faced by the media in Italy. The text messages would fall within the concept of “document” provided for by regulation 1049/2001, which establishes that in the event of non-public dissemination, applicants can refer to the ombudsman. The European Commission has received a request for access to the exchange of messages from a Dutch jurist, Martijn Nouwen, but filed a denial claiming they had all been canceled. Each month, the European Commission deletes several thousand emails and text messages and WhatsApp messages are not archived.
For this the case led to one complaint to the ombudsman who opened the investigation. But we are in a deja vu in the face of a precedent, already in 2019 the von der Leyen was criticized for a cell phone “cleaned”, believed to be key evidence in a German defense ministry procurement scandal that she led and that she was very lavish in funding private companies. The cell phone no longer contained the exchanges of messages between the people involved.
Covid vaccine. Heiko, the husband of Ursula von Der Leyen, director of the gene therapy company for vaccines
In these days the chapter concerning von Der Leyen’s husband has exploded online in this intertwining between medical-scientific and political interests.
Heiko von Der Leyen it turns out to be, as medical director, in the management team of Orgenesis, American biotechnology company specializing in cell and gene therapies, the very same technologies involved in mRna vaccines used by the most famous pharmaceutical companies against Covid. It may be a coincidence but they are the same ones on which his wife Ursula quickly closed the emergency contracts with Pfizer, at the center of numerous doubts and diatribes.
In May 2020, Orgenesis announced a COVID-19 vaccine platform to CNN Business with great emphasis: “The Company has been working aggressively in recent months to reuse its cellular vaccine platform targeting solid tumors for use against viral diseases”.
Obviously in an era of “vaccine or death” it is not from doubts that solutions come. Nor is salvation expected from questions. The words of the well-known French entrepreneur Francois Ducrocq on twitter summarize, in some way, the questions that European readers ask themselves: “Ursula van der Leyen, our largest purchaser of vaccines in hundreds of millions of units, has a husband, Heiko, who runs Orgenesis, a biotech company specializing in gene therapy. So it is clearer ”.
In light of all these intertwining and overlapping, there can be no B plan beyond vaccination, those so desired by the Italian philosopher Massimo Cacciari.
There can be nothing beyond vaccination.
And then how can we not believe in the salvific intent of the unstoppable vaccination of von der Leyen who leads the crusade of the European Union?
