Today, reported Calcio & Finanza citing Ansa, a new clash took place in the Municipality for the project of the new San Siro. The deadline for the last extension requested by the two Milanese clubs from the Municipality for the delivery of part of the documentation necessary for the project for the construction of the new stadium is approaching. The last extension was granted on April 27, the deadline by which the documents should arrive at the Municipality is June 19.
Giancarlo Tancredi, Director of Thematic Planning and Area Enhancement Area, commented: “We await the latest documentation in the next few days. The investigation will have to be completed upon delivery of all documents and the administrative verification of all documents. There will be a new council resolution that will confirm or not the public interest “.
The majority, after almost two years from the conditional go-ahead of the City Council to the new stadium project, is still split on the construction.
Carlo Monguzzi del Pd commented: “There is a very wrong urban planning idea about that part of the city. Is the Pgt that we all voted in command or the law on stadiums, a tool that has proved inadequate? I think it’s the first and therefore I think we all have to think again for a moment, not only that part of San Siro is at stake here but who is in charge in Milan. I am convinced that the stadium will not be built even after the elections ”.
David Gentili, director of the Democratic Party and president of the Anti-Mafia commission, returned to the point of the beneficial owners of the companies: “Inter will communicate the new beneficial owners with respect to what was declared in January. The theme of the beneficial owners is detached from that of the urban project and is a preparatory question of rules and procedures. It cannot be covered by confidentiality “.
Forza Italia also expresses itself, in the words of the group leader Fabrizio De Pasquale: “when we voted on the agenda, I thought it was an exercise in political synthesis to overcome objections. Instead, doubts, objections and requests began to appear again. they have the objective of overriding the elections because the issue of the stadium must not be present in the electoral campaign. That of the majority is an incoherent attitude because the junta has faith in the private sector when it wants to “.