“85% of the coronavirus spread by mistake from a Wuhan laboratory”: so the headline a few days ago Corriere della Sera, official body of information professionals.
Only two considerations have been granted to me. In the first place, what until yesterday was considered and treated as a despicable one fake news, now it becomes the prevailing thesis, in fact turning the unquestionable truth of yesterday into fake news. Like Galileo’s “eppur si movi”, so too does the track of laboratory she is now being credited, having been fought in every way. Are you really sure that the fight against fake news is fruitful? And, above all, is the fight against fake news a scientific practice or is it instead a practice of the religious Inquisition? Incidentally, when the undersigned supported the thesis of the laboratory already in February and March of 2020, he was mocked, silenced and his videos were also censored.
I now come to the second consideration. Accepting the laboratory thesis as prevalent, the first step is to say (as they are already doing) that it is a escape by mistake. You will see that it will not stop at this level. You will see that more or less quickly it will go further. And the possibility of a will be openly admitted bioengineering virus intentionally, with specific objectives.
In this regard, thinking about the possible objectives, two theses seem to me worthy of being taken into consideration.
The first thesis is of a geopolitical nature: as I already argued in 2020, Covid benefits a further cooling of relations between United States e China. In particular, it is used by the stars and stripes propaganda to de-legitimize China in every respect. Moreover, to unleash them against the condemnation of the whole world. Where this will lead is not easy to say. However, it cannot be ruled out that the final outcome may also be one war clash direct between the two superpowers.
The second track, which does not exclude the first, is the following: the creation in vitro of the virus may have been intentionally devised in view of that integral and authoritarian reorganization of the economy, society, politics that leads to the “new normal”.
In short, whether it is an escape from the laboratory, an intentional laboratory creation or even a leap of species from the bat, in any case the epidemiological emergency has played and continues to play the fundamental role of a method of Government.
RadioAttività, flashes of thought with Diego Fusaro